Post-Divorce Child Maintenance and Social Justice in Rural Indonesia

Authors

  • Tiara Mokoagow Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado, Indonesia Author
  • Muhammad Fikri Asnawir Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63077/ha622j65

Abstract

This study investigates the neglect of post-divorce child maintenance in rural Indonesia as a critical intersection of family law, social justice, and legal enforcement. Focusing on Kotabunan Village in North Sulawesi, it applies a socio-legal qualitative method that combines normative analysis of Indonesian and Islamic legal frameworks with empirical fieldwork, including interviews with divorced parents and community leaders. The findings identify three dominant patterns of child maintenance neglect: total abandonment, irregular support, and transfer of responsibility to the maternal family, driven by economic hardship, low legal awareness, and entrenched patriarchal norms. These factors contribute to a persistent gap between legal norms and actual practices, resulting in structural injustice for custodial mothers and children. From the perspective of jurisprudence and social justice, the study reveals that formal legal provisions are ineffective without cultural internalization and institutional enforcement. It argues that post-divorce child maintenance neglect is not merely a private matter but a systemic issue requiring multi-level interventions, including legal education, stronger enforcement mechanisms, and socio-economic support for single mothers. This research offers an interdisciplinary contribution to the discourse on child rights and legal pluralism in developing contexts.

Studi ini menyelidiki pengabaian pengasuhan anak pasca-perceraian di pedesaan Indonesia sebagai titik temu penting antara hukum keluarga, keadilan sosial, dan penegakan hukum. Berfokus pada Desa Kotabunan di Sulawesi Utara, studi ini menerapkan metode kualitatif sosio-legal yang menggabungkan analisis normatif kerangka hukum Indonesia dan Islam dengan penelitian lapangan empiris, termasuk wawancara dengan orang tua yang bercerai dan tokoh masyarakat. Temuan penelitian mengidentifikasi tiga pola dominan pengabaian pengasuhan anak: penelantaran total, nafkah tidak teratur, dan pengalihan tanggung jawab kepada keluarga ibu, yang didorong oleh kesulitan ekonomi, rendahnya kesadaran hukum, dan norma-norma patriarki yang mengakar. Faktor-faktor ini berkontribusi pada kesenjangan yang terus-menerus antara norma hukum dan praktik nyata, yang mengakibatkan ketidakadilan struktural bagi ibu dan anak yang memiliki hak asuh. Dari perspektif yurisprudensi dan keadilan sosial, studi ini mengungkapkan bahwa ketentuan hukum formal tidak efektif tanpa internalisasi budaya dan penegakan kelembagaan. Studi ini berargumen bahwa pengabaian pengasuhan anak pasca-perceraian bukan sekadar masalah pribadi, tetapi masalah sistemik yang membutuhkan intervensi multi-level, termasuk pendidikan hukum, mekanisme penegakan hukum yang lebih kuat, dan dukungan sosio-ekonomi bagi ibu tunggal. Penelitian ini menawarkan kontribusi interdisipliner terhadap wacana tentang hak-hak anak dan pluralisme hukum dalam konteks berkembang.

References

Agnes, F. (2011). Family Law: Volume 2: Marriage, Divorce, and Matrimonial Litigation. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5vQtDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT15&dq=Divorce+is+a+legal+event+that+has+multidimensional+significance,+not+only+for+the+separated+husband+and+wife,+but+also+for+the+children+as+the+most+vulnerable+party.&ots=zdtOdjZQh7

Akpan, I. J., & Ezeume, I. C. (2020). The Challenges Faced by Parents and Children From Divorce. Challenge, 63(6), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2020.1842025

Al Khaq, M. (2023). Pemenuhan Nafkah Anak Oleh Wanita Single Parent Dan Peran Keluarga Dari Pihak Ayah Perspektif Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Di Desa Brenggolo Kec Plosoklaten Kab Kediri) [IAIN Kediri]. https://etheses.iainkediri.ac.id/11715/

Atikah, I., Rizkia, N. D., Basri, B., Monteiro, J. M., Jaelani, E., & Silapurna, E. L. (2024). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum Sosio-Legal. CV Widina Media Utama.

Azis, A. I. F., Nawi, S., & Yunus, A. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Nafkah Anak Akibat Perceraian: Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Maros. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 2(2), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlg.v2i2.365

Collins, T. M. (2017). A child’s right to participate: Implications for international child protection. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(1), 14–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1248122

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications.

Dahlerup, D. (2018). Confusing concepts – confusing reality: a theoretical discussion of the patriarchal state. In Women and the State (pp. 93–127). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429401602-4

DeKeseredy, W. S., Dragiewicz, M., & Schwartz, M. D. (2017). Abusive endings: Separation and divorce violence against women (Vol. 4). Univ of California Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=faowDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Divorce+is+a+legal+event+that+has+multidimensional+significance,+not+only+for+the+separated+husband+and+wife,+but+also+for+the+children+as+the+most+vulnerable+party.&ots=VTdUNaAS56&

Dintara Lubis, S. (2023). Pemberian Nafkah terhadap Anak Dari Perkawinan Tidak Tercatat Menurut UU Perkawinan dan KHI. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i1.3345

Ehrlich, E. (2019). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Transaction Publishers.

Ehrlich, E., & Ziegert, K. A. (2017). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203791127

Eka, & Diah Sugiarti, L. (2024). Pemberian Hak Asuh Anak kepada Ayah Pasca Perceraian dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kuningan No. 2037/Pdt.G/2028/Pa Kng. Al Mashalih - Journal of Islamic Law, 5(01), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.59270/mashalih.v5i01.239

Fischer, T. F. C., de Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2005). Friendly and Antagonistic Contact Between Former Spouses After Divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 26(8), 1131–1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05275435

Follesdal, A. (2014). John Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness. In Philosophy of Justice (pp. 311–328). Springer.

Harefa, B. (2019). Kapita selekta perlindungan hukum bagi anak. Deepublish. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zmNYEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Anak+yang+tidak+memperoleh+nafkah+pasca+perceraian+bukan+hanya+mengalami+kesulitan+ekonomi,+tetapi+juga+berpotensi+mengalami+ketelantaran+emosional,+gangguan+perkembangan+psikologis

Huberman, A., & Miles, M. B. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, Califorinia SAGE Publications, Inc.

Husna, A. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Di Kecamatan Madat Kabupaten Aceh Timur) [UIN Ar-Raniry Pascasarjana Hukum Keluarga]. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/38028/

Islami, I. (2019). Legalitas Penguasaan Hak Asuh Anak Dibawah Umur (Hadhanah) Kepada Bapak Pasca Perceraian. Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 6(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v6i2.10715

Kosher, H., Ben-Arieh, A., & Hendelsman, Y. (2016). Children’s Rights and Social Work. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43920-4

Kurniawan, H. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Anak dalam Konflik Perceraian: Analisis Hukum Keluarga Indonesia. Wathan: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(3), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.71153/wathan.v1i3.167

Lessnoff, M. (1971). John Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Political Studies, 19(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb01922.x

Mesrati, A. O. A. (2022). ‘The Best Interests of the Child’ Under Islamic Law. In Child Rights to Guardianship (pp. 99–141). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8181-3_3

Moleong. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Rosdakarya.

Nurmala, P. (2025). Pola Nafkah Pendidikan Anak pada Perceraian di Luar Pengadilan (Studi di Desa Bungkuk, Kecamatan Marga Sekampung, Kabupaten Lampung Timur) [IAIN Metro]. http://repository.metrouniv.ac.id/id/eprint/11241/

Said, M. Y., & Nurhayati, Y. (2021). A review on Rawls Theory of Justice. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 1(1), 29–36.

Sakina, A. I., & A., D. H. S. (2017). Menyoroti budaya patriarki di Indonesia. Share : Social Work Journal, 7(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v7i1.13820

Siregar, H. F. A., & Harahap, H. I. (2025). The Emergence Of The Trend Of Childless Marriage In Europe And Its Relevance To Family Planning Programs In Indonesia In The Perspective Of Islamic Law. Merdeka Kreasi Group. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fo9gEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA13&dq=Islamic+law,+a+father%27s+obligation+to+provide+for+his+children+is+emphasized+in+various+verses,+including+QS.+Al-Baqarah:+233+and+QS.+Ath-Thalaq:+7,+and+is+reinforced+by+the+Prop

Sucipto, R. (2020). How Does Islamic Law and National Law Look at the Relinquishing of Children’s Responsibilities to Their Parents? Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 1(4), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i4.39888

Tarigan, R. S. (2024). Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Berkeadilan. Ruang Karya Bersama. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=YyIVEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Konsep+rule+of+law+yang+menuntut+kepastian+hukum+dan+perlindungan+bagi+kelompok+rentan+tidak+tercapai+ketika+putusan+pengadilan+tidak+diimplementasikan+dan+pengawasan+hukum+lemah&ot

Unicef. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Unicef. (2010). Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Unicef. (2020). The State of Children in Indonesia : Trends, Opportunities and Challenges for Realizing Children’s Rights. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/sites/unicef.org.indonesia/files/2020-06/The-State-of-Children-in-Indonesia-2020.pdf

Unicef. (2023). Second ILO-UNICEF joint report on social protection for children (Vol. 2). https://www.unicef.org/reports/about-

Van Bueren, G. (2021). The international law on the rights of the child (Vol. 35). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=cs8VEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=child+protection+theory,+which+emphasizes+that+children+have+fundamental+rights+to+receive+protection+and+fulfillment+of+basic+needs,+both+from+the+perspective+of+national+law+and+i

Yuniar, M. D., & Sudarmaji, W. (2023). The Realization of the Fulfilment of the Children’s Sustenance Post-Divorce In Purworejo Religious Court in 2020-2021. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 6(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i1.18244

Zuhdi, S., Dimyati, K., Wardiono, K., Shofia, R., & Hakim, A. (2024). The Confiscation of Husbands’ Wealth as A Collateral for Post-Divorce Child Support: Perspective of Maqāṣid Al-Sharī’ah. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(2), 912. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.17326

Downloads

Published

2025-10-17

How to Cite

Post-Divorce Child Maintenance and Social Justice in Rural Indonesia. (2025). Antmind Journal of Jurisprudence and Social Justice, 1(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.63077/ha622j65