Transformative Court-Annexed Mediation in Divorce Cases: A Legal System Perspective on the 100% Settlement Rate at the Tondano Religious Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63077/Keywords:
Mediation, Divorce, Tondano Religious CourtAbstract
Court-annexed mediation has been institutionally mandated in Indonesian Religious Courts to reduce divorce rates and promote family reconciliation; however, empirical evidence consistently shows low success rates in most jurisdictions. This study examines an exceptional case of mediation effectiveness at the Tondano Religious Court, where divorce mediation achieved a 100% settlement rate between January and June 2025. Employing a qualitative normative-empirical approach with a case study design, data were collected through in-depth interviews with certified mediator judges, litigating parties, court observations, and analysis of mediation reports and case files. The findings reveal that the success of mediation at the Tondano Religious Court was not merely the result of formal compliance with Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2016, but rather the outcome of transformative mediation practices supported by an integrated legal system. These practices include strong mediator professionalism and ethical commitment, empathetic and psychologically informed mediation approaches, the incorporation of religious and local cultural values, flexible mediation duration, and a supportive institutional environment. Using Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory, this study demonstrates that the convergence of legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture played a decisive role in achieving mediation effectiveness. The study argues that mediation in this context functions not only as a procedural requirement, but as a substantive and ethical mechanism for dispute resolution. This article contributes to the discourse on Islamic legal ethics and judicial reform by offering a scalable model of effective mediation that aligns legal norms with social and cultural realities in plural societies.
References
Abala, A. R. T. (2023). The Role of Expert Advisory Mediation in Addressing Practical and Political Barriers to ISDS Mediation. Dispute Resolution Review, 2(1), 13–24.
Alberstein, M. (2006). Forms of mediation and law: Cultures of dispute resolution. Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol., 22, 321.
Amin, N., Abbas, A. H., Abubakar, F., & Luthfi, A. (2025). Revitalizing Religious-Based Mediation in Peripheral Indonesia: An Empirical Assessment of BP4’s Role in Family Conflict Resolution. Antmind Review: Journal of Sharia and Legal Ethics, 2(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.63077/zaxhpt24
Bauböck, R. (2008). Normative political theory and empirical research. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences, 40–60.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. QMiP Bulletin, 1(33), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46
Brooker, P. (2013). Mediation law: journey through institutionalism to juridification. Routledge.
Bush, R. A. B., Folger, J. P., Folger, J., & Noce, D. J. D. (2010). Transformative mediation: Theoretical foundations. Transformative Mediation: A Sourcebook. Resources for Conflict Intervention Practitioners and Programs, 15–30.
Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10(1), 6–9.
Emery, R. E. (2011). Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation. Guilford Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Friedman, L. M. (1986). The law and society movement. Stanford Law Review, 763–780. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1228563
Hamzani, A. I., Widyastuti, T. V., Khasanah, N., & Rusli, M. H. M. (2023). Legal research method: Theoretical and implementative review. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(2), 3610–3619.
Ikhwan, M., Wahyudi, M. A., Efendi, S., Gumilang, R. M., Alfiyanto, A., & Kumalasari, R. (2025). Deciding To Be a Widow or Stay with A Husband: The Experience of Muslim Women Filing for Divorce in the Aceh Sharia Court. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 10(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v10i1.10825
Luntajo, M. M., & Hasan, F. (2025). Inheritance across faiths in Muslim Minahasa families: Legal pluralism and cultural adaptation in Manado, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art24
Melenko, O. (2020). Mediation as an alternative form of dispute resolution: Comparative-legal analysis. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 7(2), 46–63. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=956631
Moore, C. W. (2014). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. John Wiley & Sons.
Musawwamah, S. (2020). The Implementation of PERMA Number 3 of 2017 Concerning The Guidelines For Dealing With Women’s Cases on Laws As an Effort of Women Empowerment In The Judiciary in Madura. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 15(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v15i1.2883
Nawangsari, R. P. (2025). Evolution of SEMA 2002 to PERMA 2016: Mediation and its Function in Family Problem Solving. Al-Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.30983/al-hurriyah.v10i1.9248
Nurfalah, D., Amaliya, L., & Abas, M. (2024). The Effectiveness of Mediation in Inheritance Law Disputes is Linked to Perma No. 1 of 2016 at the Karawang Religious Court. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(4), 1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.450
Rajafi, A. (2020). Local Wisdom for Marriage Conflict Mediation in Muslim Minahasa, Indonesia. https://www.academia.edu/download/77630821/125946260.pdf
Roberts, M. (2016). Mediation in family disputes: Principles of practice. Routledge.
Saifullah, A. H. B. M. (2023). A Practice and Approach of Mediators Under the Shariah Jurisdiction in Resolving Family Conflicts in Malaysia [University of Malaya (Malaysia)]. https://search.proquest.com/openview/21ff9c134fb14a264ffad9afe386d6fa/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y
Tsuruhara, T., & Cremin, H. (2023). Relational transformation or resolution only? A quantitative analysis of mediator and disputant behaviors, and mediation outcome. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 41(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21402
Tutupoho, M. (2016). The Role of Mediation Institution in Resolving the Civil Disputes in the General Courts. JL Pol’y & Globalization, 53, 25. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/jawpglob53§ion=5
Van Anrooy, C. (2025). An Elaboration of the Relationship Between Religiosity and Well-Being Through Narrative Coherence: A Path Analysis. Biola University.
Venter, F. (2018). The justiciability and adjudication of religious disputes. In Research Handbook on Law and Religion (pp. 286–307). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/abstract/edcoll/9781788112468/9781788112468.00023.xml
Yue, C. A., Men, L. R., & Ferguson, M. A. (2019). Bridging transformational leadership, transparent communication, and employee openness to change: The mediating role of trust. Public Relations Review, 45(3), 101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.012
Zainuddin, A., Safa’at, M. A., Negara, T. A. S., Susmayanti, R., & Al-Fatih, S. (2025). Dispute Resolution Model for Village Head Election Results: Examining the Authority of Regents/Mayors from the Perspectives of the Principles of Justice and Independence. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 5(2), 228–260. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v5i2.41087
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alfian Muhammady, Bijak Enhasiwi, Sofwatun Awaliah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.
